Ace the Kentucky Reciprocal Salesperson Test 2025 – Unlock Your Sales Superpowers!

Image Description

Question: 1 / 400

According to the statute of frauds, which statement regarding real estate sales contracts is true?

Oral contracts are binding

Oral contracts for real estate sales are prohibited

The correct statement is that oral contracts for real estate sales are prohibited according to the statute of frauds. This legal principle requires that certain contracts, including those concerning the sale of real estate, be in writing to be enforceable. The rationale behind this requirement is to provide clear evidence of the agreement and to prevent potential disputes that could arise from misunderstandings or different interpretations of verbal contracts.

Written contracts serve as a formal record of the terms and conditions agreed upon by both parties, reducing the likelihood of ambiguity and misunderstandings about the transaction. The statute of frauds emphasizes the importance of having a clear and documented agreement when dealing with significant assets like real estate.

In contrast, the other options cannot be considered valid. The notion that oral contracts are binding is incorrect in the context of real estate, as the statute specifically excludes them from being enforceable. Stating that written contracts are optional misrepresents the legal requirements since, for real estate transactions to hold up in court, they must be formally documented. Finally, the idea that only verbal agreements are valid directly contradicts the statute of frauds, which explicitly requires written documentation for real estate sales.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Written contracts are optional

Only verbal agreements are valid

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy